RubyConf 2007 Day 3
Posted by Eric Mill
Nov 04
As expected, Day 3 is a lot more low energy, with less adventure and more audience members with headaches. People are stumbling into the talks anyway, and RubyConf wisely decided to jumpstart people’s day with Dr. Nic.
“It was a complete prick of a thing to work with. Can you say that in this country?”
—Dr. Nic Williams
“A” For Australia
Dr. Nic Williams is presenting on “Use Ruby to Generate More Ruby – RubiGen is Everywhere”, a general purpose generator framework, so you can write generators for any app where it’s really appropriate, like Merb. He’s got lots of gunfire animations, A Team action scene reconstructions, and plays the A Team theme proudly through several parts of his talk. He’s trying to break people (and the Rails team) out of thinking that generators are only Rails things, as well as demonstrate how easy it is to write generators in the first place. Dr. Nic is a great speaker, as usual, and the audience is entertained.
“I love fun.”
—Dr. Nic Williams
Dr. Nic is not the only speaker to have prepared a video, but he is the only one to have placed it on YouTube days before the conference. To my knowledge, he is also the only speaker to figure 80’s theme music prominently into his work.
First, Who All Here Is Named David
Dave Astels and David Chelimsky are introducing themselves to talk about “Behaviour Driven Development with RSpec”. This isn’t going to be a fair treatment, because I feel really distant from the whole thing. Dave asks the audience who doesn’t know what “acceptance testing” and “user stories” are. I know what a user story is, but I’ve never heard of “acceptance testing”. I’m one of only two people to raise my hand.
Now they’re showing off a feature where you can take the plaintext output of an RSpec user story run, and use a different class to parse it and run it as its own user story. It got spontaneous and strong applause, so obviously everyone is getting something I’m not. I’m resigning myself to feeling surly. Not as surly as Ryan Davis, apparently, who is standing up to ask a question, and instead giving a 2 minute diatribe of how he doesnt get BDD, without asking any actual question. When asked to come up with a question by the speakers, he ends up saying that his question is really to the audience, as to whether he’s alone or not. He fails to rally a massive rebellion against RSpec and BDD, and soon sits down.
“You’re alone, but not in that way only.”
—Chad Fowler, to Ryan Davis
The Best Idea Of All RubyConf
Rich Kilmer preceding the next speaker to tell us about the new Ruby Central Project Fund. This is meant to fund a developer, full time, for a period of 1, 2, or 3 months, to work on a Ruby project. Ruby Central will soon be accepting proposals, and publishing a document on their website as to what they’re looking for in proposals. This is terrific!

Adhearsion
Jay Phillips has begun his talk on “Next-Gen VoIP Development with Ruby and Adhearsion”. His first several minutes is a major gush about how wonderful Rails is, and how right it did everything, and how much of a huge improvement it was across the board—and there’s nothing wrong with that. He’s then moving into a whirlwind tour of how atrociously, hellishly bad it is to work directly with Asterisk, the “world’s leading open source telephony engine”.
Adhearsion is a framework to work with VoIP and Asterisk, and it looks really cool. You can use it to make and receive VoIP calls, and it supports features like Caller ID spoofing, and ways of confusing automated telemarketer robots. Apparently he’s also got Chad Fowler, Rich Kilmer, and Marcel Molina working on it, which is amazing.
What I wouldn’t have expected is that it opens up possibilities like using your cell phone as a universal remote for your XBox, or your Roomba, and integration with Jabber (e.g. GTalk) IM protocols. I don’t honestly understand why all those things are possible using Adhearsion, but I’m assured that they are. Jay has invoked the image of Bob Ross to cement this assurance.
Apparently Adhearsion 0.8 is being released later today, so this is as good a time as any to check it out.
Snow
Ben Scofield is here talking on “Cleanliness is Next to Domain Specificity”, and is focusing his attention on the theory of linguistic relativity, specifically Sapir-Whorf’s. The idea being that language affects the way you think (obviously), not just in what you think, but the very how. He uses RSpec as an example, saying how we’re wired to think of “tests” as something you do at the end of a process, and “specifications” as something you create at the beginning. By taking the test process, molding it into a specification-like language, and then presenting everything in terms of “specs” instead of tests, it’s encouraging test-first development right off the bat, without any discussion of RSpec’s actual quality.
“People say there are 10 billion words for snow in the Eskimo language. Actually, there is no Eskimo language.”
—Ben Scofield
He’s bringing up Kayak on the screen, a site I’m a huge fan of, and pointing out their Search API, and the Kayak-provided sample of Ruby code(!) to use it. The style of the sample is atrocious, and reads like bad PHP code all the way down (and it’s a long way down). He’s providing his own API syntax for Kayak, and his implementation of it, and basically trying to impress upon everyone how much better your code reads and works when you focus on the syntax first, and are willing to do what it takes to make that syntax happen.
Goodnight

And that’s it! This is my first RubyConf, unfortunately, I wish I’d been able to see it when it was a little more lowkey. I heard that this year there were a little more than 500 registrants, which is less than the ~1600 for RailsConf 2007, but is still pretty big. Most of the good presentations were inspirational in nature, not technical, and most of them succeeded at doing that. Matz’ town hall and keynote were especially surreal, but I do feel a lot more connected to the development of the Ruby language, and to the community as a whole, after participating.
I really worry about the Ruby community, and whether it can stay so positive. Already, I feel like the pride of 37signals is pushing its way in to everybody, its influence combatting with the humility of the “original” Ruby community. Matz and DHH are polar opposite personalities, yet both have strong wills and large influence. As the Ruby world swells in numbers and sense of importance, it could be very difficult indeed to prevent our culture from making the next step in Matz’ chart.
The coolest people in Ruby, doing the coolest work, are those who don’t need Ruby at all. Everyone who appreciates Ruby enough to devote time to building an alternate implementation of it, or a web framework in it, or something insane like a VoIP server, appreciates it because they’re well versed in alternatives. Even _why has shut down his Ruby blog and opened one dedicated to coding as art. And when something better comes along, these minds will move along with it, and they will enjoy the next window, the one that has just closed for Ruby—the window that opens with early adopters and progressive thinkers, and closes with opportunists and legal departments.
Comments on this post
Nov 05
Dan Croak said,
Notes from Sunday:
Rubigen ~ Dr. Nic Williams
Behavior Driven Development with RSpec ~ David Chelimsky and Dave Astels
Adhearsion ~ Jay Phillips
Security and Identity ~ Justin Gehtland
Solr ~ Erik Hatcher
Sploitin with Ruby ~ Aaron Bedra
Nov 05
Yossef said,
My first RubyConf too (and I’m hoping for later years seeing this as the start of RobeConf), and I agree that I would’ve liked to see what it was like when it was more low-key. I think it was wonderful, though, and I got a lot out of it. I mean, at the very least it was cool to meet some people (like you thoughtbot guys).
I mainly just wanted to point out my appreciation of these perspectives, these summaries of the conference. And I appreciate the concern you wrap up with here, just as you asked Matz if niceness scaled.
Also, did you find it odd at all that the keynote came before the town hall meeting instead of the other way around?
Nov 06
Eric Mill said,
The town hall meeting came on Friday night, and the keynote on Saturday night—did you mean it was weird that the keynote came after? If so, yes I do. I wonder if some of the people who asked the most aggressive questions during the town hall meeting would have chilled out if they’d gotten a handle on Matz’ personality at the keynote first.
Nov 07
Yossef said,
That’s exactly what I meant, Eric. Good job cutting through the mistakes in my comment and getting to the truth.
I hadn’t even considered the Matz personality angle, but that’s an interesting point. I was mainly thinking of all the questions that could’ve been asked at the town hall meeting that would be answered in the keynote. (That’s from a perspective of just planning it as keynote after town hall. I can’t really think of a specific case that happened this weekend.)
Sorry, comments are closed for this article.
© 2000 - 2009 by thoughtbot, inc.
written by a bushel of tiny robots
Come “ride the toad” on Hoptoad, the app error app.
Thunder Thimble: Brand monitoring for social media.
Widgetfinger: Simple content management for simple websites.
Tee-Bot, funny shirts your friends won't understand!
Umbrella Today: “It’s like totally the simplest weather report ever, Julie.”
Thoughtbot
thoughtbot is a technology consulting firm that provides web application development and design services. We focus on building modern systems, embracing good ideas and delivering elegant solutions.
Interested in learning Rails?
Sign up for our beginning or advanced training.
Archives